Stable signalUnknownHigh-risk permissions
NewsGuard icon

NewsGuard

NewsGuard's rating shields and labels help users know which news and information websites to trust.

Users20KCurrent public install base
Rating3.6Store average score
Reviews519Public review volume
Manifest versionV3Extension platform version
7-day growth0Net users gained this week
7-day growth rate0%Relative weekly velocity
Preview

NewsGuard Media preview

4 assets
Trend

User growth trend

Review user movement across collected snapshots.

User Growth Over Time

20K20K20K20K20K2026年7月16日2026年7月19日2026年7月22日Latest: 20K
Rating trend

7-day rating trend

View collected rating snapshots from the latest 7-day window to assess rating stability.

7-day rating change

Start
3.59
Latest
3.59
7-day rating change
0.00
3.493.543.593.643.692026年7月16日2026年7月19日2026年7月22日Latest: 3.59
2026年7月16日2026年7月22日
Growth overview

Daily, weekly, and monthly growth

Compare 1-day, 7-day, and 30-day net growth and growth rate.

1-day growthFlat
00%
7-day growthFlat
00%
30-day growthDeclining
-10K-33.3%
Technical snapshot

Version, languages, and crawl freshness

Review publication date, version, supported languages, and crawl timestamps.

Version5.9.9
ManifestV3
Size1.57MiB
Languages1English
Published
Store updated
Last crawled
English
Overview

Product summary

Review the store description, core capabilities, and common use cases.

NewsGuard's reliability ratings for news and information sources help users make decisions about which news sources to trust—and avoid misinformation and disinformation.

Our ratings, scores, and Nutrition Labels for websites are displayed next to links on search engines and social media platforms and cover all the news websites accounting for 95% of online engagement.

Ratings are conducted by a team of experienced journalists using nine basic, apolitical journalistic criteria. Each site receives a trust score of 0-100, an overall rating level ranging from “High Credibility” to “Proceed with Caution,” and a thorough Nutrition Label report detailing the site’s ownership and financing, content, credibility practices, transparency practices, and history.

NewsGuard is for personal use only. Any commercial, research, or other non-personal use of NewsGuard is strictly prohibited by our Terms of Service: https://www.newsguardtech.com/terms-of-service/

Reviews

Recent review snapshot

Inspect the latest comments and rating distribution.

Store average score3.6Chrome Web Store aggregate rating, including ratings without synced review text
Synced text average3.3Average computed only from synced review bodies below
Reviews with text346Synced review bodies
Total ratings / reviews519Chrome Web Store public rating/review count

Store average score: 3.6. The bars below are calculated from synced review text only, so they may be empty for extensions that have public ratings but no synced comments yet.

5
161
4
36
3
13
2
21
1
115
J M2020年1月22日
5

Excellent concept and useful tool. I would give it 4.5 stars or 4 stars only because many of the news organizations I am interested in are not rated yet. These are very often little news sites, or foreign sites with little American or British readership. That said I give it 5 stars because of the extremist that are, well extremely bias. I have seen various news sites that are liberal with Red shields (that is over all failing grade) and conservative media with Green shield (that is passing grade), and satire is marked with an orange shield. The extremist below hate the fact that their favorite very extreme news site often failed to meet many of the standards of good journalism. Bias reporting has nothing to do with it. Each news site is judged on false content, presenting information responsibly, corrects errors, handles opinions and new responsibly, avoids deceptive headlines, discloses ownership/financing, labels advertising, reveals management/conflicts of interest, and provides the names of content creators with biographical information. A news site does not need to pass all of these marks to be judged 'good'. It also gives a brief view on the news sites standards and transparency. Also is a section about the news site. It will clearly state if the organization is liberal, conservative, or moderate, with some additional information that can be helpful. Last is a link "full Nutrition Label" that will give a fairly in-depth view on why each category was rated with a green or red mark, history about the news site, and more. Along with many links supporting their decision, and even a feedback link. Before I get lambasted by the right wing haters. Take the three largest news groups, CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. All pass the general standards. CNN has one red X, Fox two, and MSNBC three. It clearly labels MSNBC as liberal, and Fox as conservative. CNN s not label by NewGuard in a political spectrum. I might add, I have hear many of the extreme right wingers start calling Fox News a liberal reporting agency. So. There you have it. I have not seen NewGuard label any organization as libertarian, green, socialize, fascist, or the like. Only liberal, conservative or no label at all. They do update the ratings. I have seen this more than once. Both for liberal and conservative sites, either as the site improves the quality of journalism and disclosure or as the site sinks into cloudy murk.

Language en
4 helpful · 1 not helpful
Scott Morrison2020年1月21日
2

Operates well but lies about the news organizations it evaluates.

Language en
1 helpful · 3 not helpful
Saved Sinner2020年1月20日
4

While the ratings can be biased / misleading, it is better than not having any idea of the veracity of what you read on the internet. No rating system is perfect, but you read their rationale behind each if you so desire.

Language en
3 helpful · 0 not helpful
Connor Rasmussen2020年1月18日
5

i think this is good work, important, and necessary. the internet information deluge could use some landmarks. and News Guard is helping with that.

Language en
4 helpful · 0 not helpful
Shaun Carlson2020年1月17日
5

This tool makes it a lot easier to judge how much a story from a source needs to be validated before believing it. Like any tool, it's not perfect, but it's a lot easier than flying blind or relying solely on my own biases. It's a nice gut check.

Language en
2 helpful · 0 not helpful
Arthur Jin2020年1月17日
4

It works on the major news sites and info sites, however the smaller, more minor ones don't have any kind of rating at all.

Language en
3 helpful · 0 not helpful
Dragonite Spam2020年1月16日
5

I use it mostly to identify The Onion knockoffs that do the bare minimum to disclose themselves, which it seems to be doing a good job of. To everyone who's observed that a number of the conservative outlets like Breitbart and whatever are getting marked red - yes, that's the point exactly. You shouldn't even need this extension to know that.

Language en
2 helpful · 0 not helpful
Search Recon (Search Recon)2020年1月11日
2

Great concept, but they are biased which isn't what i'm looking for. They are very left leaning and verify actually false news like on CNN and TheDailyBeast. While I am left leaning myself I try to read all sources and create my own opinion. But when they trash the dailywire for a true, but opinionated peace and dont when the dailybeast publishes actual fake news it's ridiculous. Cant get away from leftism bias even when I try.

Language en
0 helpful · 3 not helpful
Brandon Baggett2020年1月9日
4

Easy to use quick reference to test the validity of sites. The metrics that Newsguard uses are slightly incomplete so I wouldn't use it as the defining source of evaluating the credibility of every website, but it is a great superficial look at what certain sites contain.

Language en
3 helpful · 0 not helpful
Stephan Lattka2020年1月9日
1

Wenn die BILD Zeitung einen grünen Haken bekommt, weiß man, dass diese Erweiterung nichts weiter als FakeNews verbreitet.

Language de
5 helpful · 2 not helpful